Semantic Search Engine Omnity Claims That It Can Beat Google And Buy It

One new search engine is so confident in its technology that it thinks it could buy Google, and not the other way around.

Just a couple of days ago, Omnity was announced as a “next-generation semantic search and discovery tool”. The company calls itself a fundamental advancement in discovering technology and enabling the people to discover hidden interconnection between fields like finance, law, science, engineering, and medicine.

“What this lets users do is avoid the tyranny of taxonomy,” said Omnity CEO Brian Sager at a Tuesday evening CES event called Digital Experience. “We probably should trademark that,” he then joked.

How Omnity performs a search operation?

Omnity release post explains that the search engine allows a user to use the complete document as a search query and discover the connected documents based on the content inside the document. This way, it finds related documents even if they are not directly related to each other via links.

Sager explained that when Omnity searches across documents, it throws out “grammatical glue but semantic noise”—commonly used words like “the,” “he,” “she,” or “it.” Stripped of this “noise,” Omnity is then able to analyze the remaining “rare words” to find common threads that link together different documents.

“The Omnity product highlights several unusual features. For example, a single person reading and pair-wise interconnecting a 100,000 documents would take nearly 10,000 years. Omnity can perform this function in a fraction of a second, which represents a trillion-fold acceleration,” said Brain Sager, Omnity co-founder.

Sager wants to upend the basic idea of search just like Google performed the search in 1998 while looking for academic articles.

What about Omnity vs Google?

“We don’t view ourselves as being complementary and not competitive with Google,” said Sager. When asked by Motherboard if this meant Omnity was looking to be acquired by Google, he mentioned something very surprising.

I use Google every day and it’s great, but no, we’re more likely to buy Google.

Court orders Google to pay Dr Janice Duffy $100,000 plus interest for not removing her from Google Search

Court orders Google to pay Dr Janice Duffy $100,000 plus interest for not removing her from Google Search

An Australian woman has been awarded $100,000 in damages, plus interest after she successfully won the defamation case filed against Google.

Janice Duffy, 59, a former SA health department researcher took the internet search giant to court after claiming articles published on the “Ripoff Report” website from 2007 defamed her. The site is a “shaming platform” that allows anyone to post reports about people whom they suspect are behaving in a criminal or dishonest manner, regardless of its factual accuracy.

Despite bringing the articles to their attention, Google denied her request to remove the webpages from its search engine inspite of telling them that her prospective employers could chance upon the material.

Finally, in 2011, she launched a civil lawsuit against Google in the South Australian Supreme Court, as for two years, it refused her written requests to take action on her behalf.

The court heard Google progressively removed the display of extracts from and links to the “Ripoff Report” from its Australian website.

Dr Duffy also claimed the auto-complete search terms suggested by Google were harmful, due to them directing users to the “Ripoff Report” site.

Also See:Facebook bug welcomes new year by telling users they have been friends for 46 years

Google fought the case, arguing defences of innocent dissemination, qualified privilege, justification and contextual truth.

In his judgment in October, Justice Malcolm Blue struck out several of the defences.

He found the search results either published, republished or directed users towards comments harmful to her reputation.

On Wednesday, Justice Blue awarded Dr Duffy damages of $100,000 and a $15,000 lump sum to cover interest.

Dr Duffy’s lawyer, Paul Heywood-Smith, has also asked the Supreme Court to make an order for costs to cover the legal fees his client has paid during the lengthy battle.

The court has reserved its decision on costs.

Counsel for Google has asked payment of those amounts to be stayed until January, pending argument on court costs and a possible appeal.

‘I stood up to them and for that I’m pleased’

Dr Duffy has tweeted that if Google was to launch any appeal, she would respond with a “cross appeal”.

Outside court, she described Wednesday’s ruling as “vindication”.

“It’s been a long battle and it’s not over,” she said.

“After the trial I couldn’t get off the couch for three weeks … but it’s something that has to be done.

“I think that they thought that they could make me go away. I’m stubborn.

“I stood up to them and for that I’m pleased. I beat the bastards.”

Earlier this year, Dr Duffy represented herself during the trial, after initially being represented by lawyers.

Since the trial she has again hired legal representation.

The ruling comes after Google was ordered by the European Court of Justice to introduce the “right to be forgotten”, which means old, inaccurate or irrelevant data must be omitted from search results if a person involved requests it.